 |
Fluoride Radio
Transcripts |
Back to
Fluoride in Our Drinking Water?
Below are the incomplete transcripts (provided by the Government
Media Monitoring Service) of inteviews on either Leon Byner's
5AA Morning Show or ABC's Morning Show in which fluoride has
featured:
- SA Government Media Monitoring Service -
RADIO NEWS & TALKBACK PRECIS
v
Morning / Lunch Period
(9am–1pm)
Friday, 1 October 2010
RADIO NEWS BROADCASTS
Ann
Bressington, MLC
(5AA
10.07-10.11)
Water fluoridation
(Byner:
This story is extraordinary. I’ve often said we live in a more
privatised dictatorship. We think we’re living in a democracy …
but the world is changing. Global companies and privatisation and
corporatisation are starting to rule the roost and whether we like
it or not it’s what we’re being given. Now most ordinary people
would be shocked to know that the fluoride that is put into our
water supply is not a pharmaceutical grade product but rather a
toxic waste product of the aluminium and phosphate fertiliser
industry that’s called Fluorosilic Acid. Now what is interesting …
the European court of justice has ruled that when used in water
supplies fluoride was then used as a medicine and not to improve
water quality and that mass medication was unacceptable for
reasons that you would understand. The dosage isn’t regulated for
each individual, the frequency of use is not regulated, the
necessity of the medication and so on. Now, sodium fluoride is
dumped into our water supply because there is no cheaper method of
disposal for the aluminium and phosphate industries. And yet, when
we were sold … fluoride for your teeth, we all kind of thought –
well, yeah, maybe. And there were some lone voices out there years
ago that were saying, ‘hang on a minute, you mightn’t be doing the
very smart thing’. … adverse effects to fluoride have been noted
in peer-reviewed scientific and medical papers. And these are in
the America Medical Journal. Now I mentioned a few … mental
dullness; I’ve always said, ‘what’s in the water on North
Terrace?’. This might explain it. Gastrointestinal problems. The
dental fraternity agree that dental fluorosis is caused by over
exposure to fluoride or fluoride toxicity. Increase in fractures,
hyperactivity and attention deficit. So let’s talk to the person
that rang the bell for me … Ann Bressington. … )
Leon, Mount Gambier is due
to go online for water fluoridation of their Blue Lake at the end
of October- there’s been a group down there called Choice who are
protesting about this and trying to get the ear of the minister
now for about three years. The minister has refused to meet with
them and so has the public health official – so I was interested
in this prior to that but I decided I would go down to Mount
Gambier … the angst down there is just absolutely enormous. People
just do not want this and they are going to be forced to drink
this poison. … as the rest of us are already.
(Byner: … this is a serious
allegation … we have always assumed that the fluoridation of our
water supply was for our good and for our dental health. What do
you say?) Well the research is there - … doctor AK Sheshila of
the [unclear] institute in India has written over 80 published
papers on this and has identified from her practice and her
medical career that it also has very, very harsh effects on the
unborn child. In America now they issue warnings that baby formula
should not be reconstituted with fluoridated water. They advise
that children under five should not use fluoridated toothpaste and
they also put a warning … on that if swallowed to seek advice from
a poisons information centre immediately. So this is not, as I
said, the problem with this is it’s not pharmaceutical grade and
people would have believed that it was. It comes in a chimney
stack of the aluminium and phosphate industry. So it’s a toxic,
corrosive substance; public health officials will tell us that
they are merely topping up what is naturally occurring in our
waters. The substance that naturally occurs in our waters is
calcium fluoride and it is a completely different substance … and
as I said, the evidence is there. I’m asking this government to at
least look at the evidence that’s been presented overseas, the
papers that have been written and to reconsider this because we’re
one of five countries that use fluoride … out of the entire world.
The whole of the European Union have rejected it, Sweden was
fluoridating for about 20 years. Then got presented with this
evidence and pulled it straight away.
(Byner:
Today Tonight’s Frank Pangallo is on the case.)
Frank
Pangallo, Today Tonight
(5AA
10.11-10.18)
Water fluoridation
(Byner:
As I said at the outset, everybody listening today will remember
that we were sold the idea of fluoride in the water as a health
remedy for our teeth.) Yes we were, about forty years ago –
it’s been in our water supply for about forty years – there have
been no studies done on what the impact of fluoride has on
people’s health. Now it is a poison. SA Water every day puts
poison in our tap water. And I’ll tell you what it contains … I’ve
got a certificate of analysis here in front of me - … it’s got
[unclear], arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, iron,
lead, mercury, selenium and on it goes and these are in there. Now
who in their right mind would want to put poisons in drinking
water? Why would you do it? … we’re doing it simply because
there’s this belief that it actually reduces tooth decay. But
there’s a lot of scientific evidence worldwide now that this isn’t
the case at all. … what it does do is it probably kills microbes
in your mouth. Now you’re probably get enough fluoride to do that
simply by brushing your teeth and there’s nothing wrong with that
… that’s fine, you’ll get that. For governments to actually
dictate to you and me that ‘we’re going to mass-medicate you’ by
putting this stuff in there, I don’t want it. … you may recall
that during the state election that you had the government come on
about not wanting to –
(Byner; Drink rainwater) … because it was all the stuff that
was coming off the roads and everything. Yet, every day SA Water
puts this stuff in there. –
(Byner: … did you approach SA Water about this?) They won’t
even talk to me about anything now – the stories I’ve done about –
well it’s not SA Water’s decision, it’s a decision made by SA
Health to put that in there, and it’s their decision for Mount
Gambier’s water supply.
(Byner: So has SA Health decided that they wanted to read the peer
review documents that we’ve talked about today, which by the way
you can get on the internet quite easily and they wanted to
withdraw the fluoride, we could do it … tomorrow?) Of course …
but they won’t. (Byner: Why
won’t they?) Because it’s a bureaucratic decision that’s been
made and they certainly don’t want to be seen to be back tracking.
But they don’t want to make a brave and informed decision … that’s
the problem you’ve got with government today. They’re making
decisions for us without us having a say. There’s 1,100 scientists
worldwide that have signed a deed about the dangers of fluoride
and we’re talking about very eminent people in the world …
(Byner: Could you give us a
website address and we’ll link it to the 5AA website because I
know that people are going to be interested in seeing this and …
many have rung over the years about this Frank and I think it’s a
very valuable debate that Ann … has brought to you … to the
public. Are you running this on Seven tonight?) … we’ve
already done several stories – we did one as recently as last
week. One other fact – they now want to put it into bottled water.
(Byner: … why? … )
They’re saying that kids aren’t getting enough out of the tap and
they’re drinking the bottled water instead so let’s put it in
there. You know, people need to have a choice, whether you want to
be medicated or not –honestly, this stuff is dangerous.
(Byner: what worries me …
about the choice issue, but the … American medical journal which
talks about this – it gives you bone cancer in young boys – these
are all connections with this sodium fluoride. Skin rashes,
chronic fatigue, aching muscles, mental dullness, gastrointestinal
– I mean that’s awful. … ) It is, but … another example – ..
it’s a waste product from the aluminium and super phosphate
industries. Make no doubt about it – if you see a container of
this stuff it’s got skull and crossbones on it – that’s what
they’re putting in our water. But … in Portland near the Alcoa
[phonetic] aluminium plant there’s been a fallout of this material
into the land and the vegetation around it and kangaroos … in that
area have been found to have effects of fluorosis where their
joints have been affected, they almost look arthritic … and you’re
telling us it’s okay for us?
(Byner: Frank thank you
indeed.)
Back
to Ann Bressington
(Byner:
Is there a website people can go to …?) Yes:
www.fluoridealert.com and that will
provide numerous links to numerous papers that have been published
and researched. And also on my website:
www.bressington.net. I have video
interviews with scientists downloaded onto my website as well so
people can get the information. … one more thing – in 1989, a guy
called Dennis Stevenson from the Legislative Council in Canberra
ran a parliamentary inquiry into fluoride and he had to write a
177 page dissenting report because the parliament refused to
publish the research that was available then on the harms of
fluoride. (Byner: … because
they’d introduced it. The people at SA Health now were not the
same people who legislated for this some time ago -) NO, but
the people at SA health now still refuse to meet with
professionals and hear the research and hear the information in
order for them to make an informed consent to poison us or not.
(Byner: … the public can
take control of this – if you read this information and you think
it’s got currency don’t drink tap water.) And Leon also just
to warn people – when you boil fluoridated water it actually
increases the … strength of the fluoride of the water by 600
times. You cook your vegetables with it, you’re contaminating the
food that you’re eating. So boiling the water won’t get this out –
the only way to get this out of your water is with reverse osmosis
filter.
(Byner: Ann
Bressington thank you and Frank … what do you think … ? I bet
there’ll be a couple of callers who ring in and say ‘I told you
so’.)
Caller
Dr Michael
(5AA
10.19-10.22)
Water fluoridation
I’m
a dentist who is very opposed to fluoridation on health grounds,
but I also have concerns that the actual data on fluoridation
effects doesn’t stack up any more – the data on tooth decay. One
fact that’s been known for many years – and health officials have
known this … is that fluoridation delays tooth eruption … that
means that the data that they present when they compare a
fluoridated area to a non … will definitely show an improvement if
you compare, say, 12 year olds. But when you factor in the fact
that the tooth eruption is delayed by up to a year it negates any
so-called benefit from fluoridation. In other words, the data that
the public’s been given to say that – the best data sort of says
about a 30% improvement in tooth decay rates in 12 year olds, is
totally invalid, because they never, ever present the truth which
is that tooth eruption is delayed by fluoridation.
(Byner: So … what do you
advise people to do?) I definitely don’t think they should be
drinking this poisonous substance in the water supply. I am
totally opposed to it – I think it’s a great deception to the
people – (Byner: Why did we
do it?) It dates right back to the 1940s and 50s … there was a
tremendous problem with disposing of contaminated and fluoridated
waste from the uranium industry … aluminium and super phosphate.
(Byner: Are you saying we
invented a reason to put it in the water?) I think we can be a
little bit conspiratorial and I don’t think government has ever
bothered to look at it since. It’s been very significant vested
interests in continuing this method to sanitise the image of
fluoride. Fluoride is a highly toxic substance …
(Byner; The fluoride that
you want in your mouth is calcium fluoride is it not, where this
is sodium fluoride?) This is actually an industrial waste …
you can’t actually breathe the stuff in, it corrodes your lungs,
you can’t get skin contact with it.
(Byner: … are you telling
people that you’re advising them not to drink the water?)
Absolutely and I think what we should be urgently telling nursing
mothers is that we should be following the Canadian and American
and United States dental association warnings which have been
ignored here that they shouldn’t mix infant formula with
fluoridated water in the first 12 months of an infant’s life.
(Byner: Thank you … I may call on you again
sooner rather than later.)
- SA Government Media Monitoring Service -
RADIO NEWS & TALKBACK PRECIS
v
Morning / Lunch Period
(9am–1pm)
Tuesday, 5 October 2010
RADIO
NEWS BROADCASTS
Merilyn
Haynes, Queensland for Safe Water
(5AA
11.09-11.13)
Fluoridated water
(Byner:
The former Minister for Health in the Whitlam Government, Doug
Everingham, has written a letter to John Hill … suggesting that he
rethink fluoridation in our water supply … in Mt Gambier at the
Blue Lakes we are going to consider putting fluoride in their
water and there is also consideration by health authorities to put
fluoride in the bottled water that you drink … I’ve spoken to a
lot of dentists … who say that the evidence about whether or not
fluoride in the water is good for your teeth is sometimes neither
here nor there … a lot of people said … this is a beat up, we’ve
been drinking it for 40 years so what’s the big deal? I’ll tell
you the big deal: a lot of people now like to ask what’s being put
in their bodies and they want a choice … if there is good
scientific information that there is a problem then people ought
to be informed. So Merilyn Haynes … tell us what’s happening in
Queensland and why this should be a debate for South Australia as
well.) … until a couple of years ago we didn’t really have
much water fluoridation in Queensland, less than 5% of the
population and that basically was Townsville and a couple of small
towns … and then they did fluoridate an Aboriginal community …
what we know is … it was absolutely forced upon us, we didn’t have
a choice … as soon as … Anna Bligh got in … a couple of months
later she announced it was going to be forced on us … we do know
they’ve never done any health risk assessments, they relied on the
National Health and Medical Research Council … review of 2007 … we
know from that the NHMRC was supposed to look at the … cumulative
effects of fluoride on people with kidney impairment … that was
part of the tender for this private contract but … they did not do
it, there was not a word about it in the final review …
(Byner:
… information that I was gleaning over the weekend … was that
… the body coverts this sodium fluoride into calcium fluoride.)
No, it doesn’t really matter … the fluoride … and they use three
different types of fluoride; they use sodium fluoride … they use
sodium [unclear] fluoride which is solid, they use hydrofluoric
acid which is a liquid. The two silico fluorides are waste
products of the fertiliser, superphosphate fertiliser industry …
(Byner:
… you are fighting this battle in Queensland, do you also
believe that the fluoride that’s in our water is actually waste
products from aluminium and other smelters?) … it is
absolutely certain that our waste products of the superphosphate
fertilising industry and are waste products of aluminium smelting
... (Byner:
… so Queenslanders now will have fluoride in their water
whether they like it or not?) Yes … half of Queensland’s now
been fluoridated in the last couple of years against the wishes …
the whole thing is it’s forced mass medication. It goes against
all the principles of informed consent.
(Byner:
Alright … thank you for joining us.)
Dennis
Stevenson, Former ACT Parliamentarian
(5AA
11.14-11.20)
Fluoridated water
(Byner:
…there was a … Federal Government inquiry some years ago looking
scientifically at evidence about fluoridation in water. This guy
was a member of government in the ACT that sought to FOI and get
that report out… tell me what that report found.)
The report
found two things, first of all the inquiry was established in 1989
and we finally reported in 1991 and what happened … we took
medical, legal, dental etc evidence from all around the world,
many, many countries including … Australia. The majority of
members on that inquiry [unclear] Members of Parliament
unfortunately decided to suppress the evidence that fluoridation
causes death – thousands of them – is obviously against individual
rights, is a major environmental problem and other things. Now
fortunately I had looked at the evidence … and as they wouldn't
even let me put the little bit in the report that supposedly was
against fluoridation I submitted my own [unclear] report of 177
pages. All I did was compile the evidence we’d received and put it
in and that’s what they should have done but they tried
deliberately to suppress that evidence and it’s amazing when you
read that report … that’s available to anybody from the ACT
Legislative Assembly.
(Byner: What’s in it, what
does it say?) My report gave the truth, the rest of it was
basically a fraudulent cover up of the truth. This public inquiry
on behalf of the citizens of Canberra and Australia … they had a
responsibility, a legal, Constitutional, moral responsibility, to
report what they’d found. They deliberately suppressed it.
(Byner: All right, what did
you find?) It wasn’t so much what I found, it’s what the
evidence showed … that about 50,000 people in America are killed
by fluoridation each year at one part per million or similar to
Australia and 10,000 of them from cancer. This was the subject of
a major court case in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court
over there in 1978. This is how long it’s been known that this has
been killing people and there were experts from all around the
world on both sides … evidence for five months … [the Judge] said
there was basically no evidence … that fluoride was any good and
it was absolutely compelling that it caused grievous harm and he
ruled that it not be allowed to go in the water supply that the
case was about. (Byner:
…why is there such a cover up about this?) …very good point
but you used the word correctly – it is a cover up. I’ve got a
very good understanding of fluoridation and the various aspects …
but it’s unfortunately all too rare that I get a chance to talk on
major media … I commend you… to present the simple evidence … I’ll
debate with them … had a number of debates and I or we win those
very, very easily, it surprises them. There are a number of
points. In the 1930s and 40s in America there were major court
cases where aluminium companies and others … were being sued
successfully for millions of dollars … because of the fluoride
waste pouring out of their smoke stacks across America landing and
poisoning crops, livestock and in some cases people … they needed
to do something about this because it wasn’t easy to get rid of,
it’s too poisonous. So one of the people they hired … came up with
the idea that it was good for your teeth and that was never true.
There had never been and has never been any single study in the
entire world that shows that fluoride is beneficial for people …
we’re told … that fluoride is a natural product occurring in the
water- (Byner: -where does
that leave us – we’ve been fluoridating the water for 40 years, we
didn’t ask anybody, we did the nanny state and said ‘well, we know
better, you’re just going to have it’ – what do people do now? I
guess if they choose to be cautious they’ll be looking at ways to
get this out of their water.) Quite right, the first thing is
not to drink it, I do not drink fluoridated water … you’ve got to
go across to organic foods … this chemical that goes in our water,
silicofluoride, as a redenticide [phonetic], insectide, fungicide,
bactericide and … a fluoridating agent in municipal drinking
water. (Byner: …is there a
website you can recommend … more information about this?)
…very good website coming out of America called ‘Fluoridation’ but
if they just searched the word ‘Fluoridation’ … most of it is for
freedom of choice not against freedom of choice where politicians,
who know nothing about health … that’s not their field of study,
where politicians have decided that we should ingest this deadly
poison for all our lives even if we don’t have any teeth.
(Byner: …thank you …if you
go and have a look at YouTube and put Doug Everingham’s name in
there … former Minister of the Whitlam Government, he’s doing an
interview on YouTube talking about why he’s changed his mind on
the fluoridation of our water supply. He’s the man that’s written
to John Hill and said ‘Minister, have a rethink.’)
Ann
Bressington, Independent MLC
(5AA
11.24-11,26)
Fluoridated water
Dennis Stevenson will actually be in Adelaide
this week, he is going to the Mount Gambier meeting but also that
we’ve sent out an invitation to all MPs to come to a briefing on
Monday at Parliament House so that they can hear what he has to
say about fluoridation … very knowledgeable.
(Byner: I wonder how many
will turn up?) …Leon, John Hill and Dr Cunliffe can’t even
make it to Mount Gambier to answer the people’s questions down
there. (Byner: Of course
they can’t.) So I certainly hope that a trip to Parliament
House won’t be too much for them but also to let people know that
also last year, probably around June, I’m hoping to bring Dr Paul
Conett [phonetic] and Dr AK Shashuel [phonetic] over here who are
two of the world’s leading experts on fluoridation and I’m going
to be calling for a
Parliamentary Inquiry in South Australia on fluoridation and the
toxicology of this has never been studied in Australia, Leon, so
these two scientists will be coming over to give evidence to this
Parliamentary Inquiry … if the truth comes out … that it is a
cover up, that we are drinking poison in our water, I believe the
people of South Australia should be enraged about this and take
action and demand that it be removed.
(Byner: … as I said … for many people now what they want is an
informed choice … we’ve had it in our water for 40 years and some
might say … ‘Look, it hasn’t killed me’ but if you go and have a
look at some of the information that’s out there, including
respected peer reviewed medical journals in the United States and
others, there is an issue, a very serious issue and of course we
are more of the Three Wise Monkeys here in South Australia, say
nothing, hear nothing, see nothing and hope it’ll all go away,
aren’t we Mr Hill?)
- SA Government Media Monitoring Service -
RADIO
NEWS & TALKBACK PRECIS
v
Morning / Lunch Period
(9am–1pm)
Friday, 8 October 2010
RADIO NEWS BROADCASTS
Dennis Stevenson, former Member Legislative
Assembly (ACT)
(5AA
21.08-21.20)
Fluoridation rally to be held in
Mount Gambier this weekend
(Francis:
…Dennis Stevenson … has come down as guest speaker for a
fluoridation rally which is …I believe held in Adelaide last night
…)
… there’s going to be a big one held in
Mount Gambier on Saturday night … I heard you mention … we could
do with some change in politicians and I think most people would
agree with that. (Francis:
…you’re not a lawyer, Dennis?) … No … I’m basically like the
people you were talking about. I’m very much down to earth.
I was in Parliament for two terms … but I was one of the
people that voted against this nonsensical idea of putting
fluoride in our drinking water … that’s no way to medicate people.
If you want to go to a doctor, they have to examine you, they have
to check what illness you have, they have to find out your age,
your weight, your sex, what other drugs you’re taking that might
conflict - there are actually about 15 different things, none of
that’s done with fluoride, they just put it in the water for
everyone. (Francis: … I
googled it the other day … and I can remember 40 years ago … when
talkback first started, prior to talkback starting we used to do …
just interviews on the air … we had the leaders of the democrats …
fluoridation was just about to be put in the water and people
screamed and yelled and shouted and said … it’d rip your teeth to
pieces … and yet it’s been going for 40 years. It went ahead, they
put it in, dentists started saying … we’re not getting many people
to come in to fix up their teeth, we’ll start having dental
hygienists to make some … money … suddenly, because it’s going
into Mount Gambier, fluoride’s bad. What’s happened, Dennis? Are
you a professor …) … people have simply not been told the
truth … (Francis: …it’s
taken 40 years to … tell the truth?) … you find that there are
a lot of things in Parliament where people don’t … get told what’s
happening. I was a member of Australia’s major fluoridation
inquiry, this began in 1989 and finished in 1991 in Canberra … we
researched evidence all around the world, we had submissions from
everywhere – scientific submissions, medial, dental, human rights
and so on and the vast majority of those submissions showed that
fluoride was … dangerous, it even killed people … in America. It
obviously was not something to do if people have a right to decide
what drug they take. It absolutely goes against that, only
individuals or parents have a right to decide what drugs they take
or their kids. It was also shown to be one of the world’s major
environmental problems because fluoride waste comes out of many
heavy metal industrial manufacturing plants, things like
aluminium, super phosphate, clay, brick and so on and this was
where fluoridation started way back when … this was in the early
30s and 40s in America where huge companies like Alcoa and
Reynolds were sued for millions of dollars … for the fluoride
waste being belched out of their smokestacks, landing on crops and
livestock and killing them . So the result of that was Alcoa hired
a fellow to do some research and he came up with the idea that the
cause of the brown stain and the change in children’s teeth … was
an improvement. Now this is nonsense. What it actually was, is
dental fluorosis and you’ll see this all over Adelaide and any
fluoridated community.
(Francis: … I’ve never heard that in my bloody life!) … you
highlight the very, very factor that is keeping this information
from people. (Francis: …I’m
dead against what you’re talking about but I know … there are
people who live it and people who hate it … I don’t give a damn …
because it’s done nothing to my teeth … my teeth are a $45,000 set
…) You’ve probably been using yours for a long time …
(Francis: …do you think
it’s why people are drinking more bottled water these days?)
There’s no question whatsoever. That’s why the bottled water
industry is become a multi-billion dollar industry. People don’t
want to drink the fluoridated water out of the tap. I simply do
not drink it ever. I wouldn’t even drink a cup of tea …
(Francis: …the taste of our
water has been like shit for the last hundred years … we’re famous
in Adelaide for having absolute crap as water …) … I used to
hear that on the east coast, but of course fluoride is colourless,
odourless and tasteless… that’s one of the dangers with it. What
you find with dental fluorosis, this mottling of children’s teeth
… that’s the first sign of a [unclear] breakdown of the teeth, the
tooth structure … dentists make millions of dollars in Australia
putting covers or caps over teeth that get that ugly white, cream
or brown unsightly mottling … it’s not cosmetic …
(Francis: … every time I
wish to go to the … dental hygienist you’d have your clean and the
scraping then they go now we’re going to put a little bit of
fluoride all over your teeth.) … let me tell you an example of
where that happened in America. Graham Kenneally in New York … his
mum took him along to the dentist for the first examination ever.
His teeth were perfect. The nurse gave him a fluoride treatment …
she painted this stuff on his teeth and the fluoride killed the
fellow … (Francis: …that’s
scaredy scaredy stuff. That’s one in a bloody squillion.) The
point is … she gave him a glass of water and she didn’t say spit
it out and he swallowed it and the coroner said there was enough
poison in Graham’s body to kill three people … In Brisbane, Jason
Burton was just a young lad and his mother, on the advice of the
local dentist, had been giving the kid one fluoride tablet a day …
he got into the bottle and in all he took four tablets … I’ve got
a copy of … Jason Burton’s death certificate and it says fluoride
poisoning. It’s not unusual that fluoride kills people. It’s very
unusual that they ever say it though. In America, it’s killing
about 50,000 people a year in fluoridated as against fluoride free
communities. (Francis:
…Hasn’t killed me.) … why don’t we know these things …
(Francis: …It’s been in the
water system in Adelaide for 40 bloody years.) It’s true … but
the point is you’ve got to admit we’re a very, very sick society.
People are dying like flies, they’ve got any number of ailments.
They’ve got tremendous problems with their bones. What fluoride
causes is fluorosis. You say where did they get that name
fluorosis from? Not hard to tell is it … dental fluorosis is the
cellular break down of your teeth. The rest of the fluorosis that
you can’t see causes a vast increase in hip fractures in
fluoridated countries … very, very few countries are fluoridated
around the world … far less than 4%.
(Francis: …I guarantee
you’ll never stop it being taken out of the …water system here in
Adelaide but you’re trying to do it in Mount Gambier before they
shove it into the Blue Lake or something.) … it’s true!
Doesn’t it all come down to the fact that you’ve got a right to
decide what drugs you take … if you’ve got kids, you’ve got that
right. No politician, and they’re certainly not qualified to make
a statement, has got the right to force this stuff in our water.
Water is vital to life. If you’re going to use it as a vehicle for
drugging … you’re creating a very dangerous precedent. This stuff
accumulates in the body. Let’s look at what the World Health
Organisation’s International Agency for Cancer Research calls it …
they say it’s an insecticide, fungicide, bactericide and
rodenticide … that’s a rat poison … it’ll actually kill any living
thing on the planet from the smallest microbe to the largest
animal … I would not drink the water out of the tap in South
Australia while I’m down here. I might have a go up at Mount
Gambier. (Francis: …I used
to love the comment saying, ‘I don’t drink the water – fish
fornicate in it.’) That was a good old one … it’s something
that’s obviously against people’s will. We had dozens and dozens
of referendums right around Australia and nearly every one of them
… people decide no they don’t want politicians to put fluoride in
our water supply … actually written a one page sheet …and people
can find out all the information they want … it’s all over the
internet … simply search the term ’12 reasons to reject
fluoridation’ … they will get a one page sheet that I put a lot of
time into … that’s all they need to read in their life … I think
you’ll find it’s very interesting that we’re not told about these
things. The inquiry I was on in Canberra … that was Australia’s
major Government inquiry … we received all this evidence from all
around the world about the cancer. I listed an A to Z of illnesses
it causes and this is evidence received by a Government inquiry …
what did the majority of members of that inquiry decide to do in
Canberra? They decided to suppress that information. The only
reason that that evidence went into that inquiry final report is
because as a Member of Parliament I had the right of a dissenting
report … I didn’t write it, I simply did what the committee should
have done on behalf of the people of Canberra. I compiled the
report from the evidence we received.
(Francis: …good luck in
Mount Gambier this week … ) … thank you very much indeed for
your time.
- SA Government Media Monitoring Service -
RADIO
NEWS & TALKBACK PRECIS
v
Morning / Lunch Period
(9am–1pm)
Sunday, 10 October 2010
RADIO
NEWS BROADCASTS
Ann Bressington, MLC
(5AA
20.28-20.45)
Fluoridation in Mount Gambier
(Perry:
… we’re going to go straight over to the very patient and
hard-working lady who is a Member of our South Australian
Parliament … Ann Bressington … ) … I just thought I would let
South Australian people know about a meeting we had in Mount
Gambier last night on fluoridation of their water supply, their
Blue Lake and why I’ve really gotten interested in this particular
issue. I’ll ask you a question that I’ve asked many people, would
you expect that the fluoride that we’re putting in our water would
be a pharmaceutical grade product?
(Perry: You would like to
think so but I believe it’s not) Not it’s not. It’s actually a
really toxic, corrosive waste product of the aluminium and
phosphate fertilizer industry
(Perry: I heard that the
other day, I was horrified) Absolutely. It’s known as
hexofluorosilicic acid and never meant for human consumption,
never approved for human consumption and basically it’s getting
dumped in our water supply and is being rebadged sodium fluoride
and that’s what they’re saying is good for our teeth
(Perry: The weird thing I
found about this whole thing is that there seems to be so many
issues surrounding the whole way that it works and what it is and
stuff, that why would we suddenly be looking at introducing it
into new areas, and particularly when you look at somewhere like
Mount Gambier, with the Blue Lake and stuff, why would you even
begin to think about messing with anything in that sort of
department in an area that is world renowned for its blue lakes?)
Absolutely. Well … just as you drive up the hill to the Blue Lake
you see a sign saying ‘No trucks carrying any toxic substances are
allowed to pass by on this road’, they’ve got to take an
alternative route, but we’re going to dump this crap in the water
for people to drink. We had a public meeting last night where 200
people rocked up, 200 people voted against fluoridation and
they’ve been trying to get a meeting with John Hill and Dr
Cunliffe from Health SA for three years. On radio in January Dr
Cunliffe promised the people of Mount Gambier that there would be
a public meeting and a public discussion on the issue of fluoride
before it went on tap. And nothing had happened so we held that
meeting and invited them down. They didn’t come. But on the very
day … that the public meeting was being held, people got a letter
in their junk mail stating that after years of public consultation
and blah de blah de blah fluoride is going on tap on Thursday in
Mount Gambier (Perry:
That’s bizarre) Well, this is a bizarre Government and it is a
bizarre Health Department
(Perry: Why are we so determined to do this? Are there suddenly
dental health problems in Mount Gambier I haven’t heard about?)
So they say, but that’s what every country, and there’s only four
of us mind you, says to expand these fluoride treatment centres
into other areas, it’s the same reason that Anna Bligh used in
Queensland to expand their fluoridation systems in Queensland
(Perry: But doesn’t it cost
us money to do these things?) It costs us a lot of money. I’ve
actually put in an FOI and asked the question Parliament, but we
estimate it’s a pretty hefty amount. But we’re actually buying
this toxic waste, this rat poison, and that’s exactly what it is
according to the … World Health Organisation, it’s a rodenticide,
a pesticide and a herbicide. We’re buying it from China and
Belgium where they’ve actually banned water fluoridation. So we’re
buying their toxic waste to put in our water supply because they
don’t want to use it
(Perry: And we’re talking about a country like China where
everyone is saying we don’t want food from there because they
don’t have any decent looking after their stuff, and they’ve
banned it. That’s probably a fair indicator that we should be
going.. I just don’t understand why the desperate need to expand
this industry) I would say somewhere along the line there’s a
commercial contract between Australia and these countries that
needs to be honoured and that it’s a commercial agreement rather
than a good public health policy. I wasn’t really up on this until
about eight weeks ago. I’d done some research back on it when I
was studying natural and traditional medicine, but there wasn’t a
lot of research out on it at that stage, but we’ve known since
1995 now, from a peer review published medical journal, an article
done by Dr Phyllis Milleneux [phonetic] who is a neurologist and
toxicologist, that this stuff we’re calling fluoride actually
lowers the IQ in infants, it mimics or causes ADHD in children.
Another study done … shows that it increases a young boy’s chances
of getting osteosarcoma, which is a deadly bone cancer, their
chances are increased by five to seven times to develop that.
Chronic fatigue, mental dullness and Alzheimer’s type illness,
gastrointestinal problems … it was also found it was responsible
for low birth weight babies, stillbirth and skeletal deformities
in babies … it affects the thyroid and it actually has shown in
fluoridated areas … an increase in fractures in the elderly. So
we’re talking osteoporosis, which doctors are saying how come so
many people are developing osteoporosis? We’re talking gut
problems that are being treated with all sorts of other drugs that
often contain fluoride, so it agitates it even more.
Alzheimer’s … doctors say
that’s caused from an accumulation of aluminium in the brain. This
is a by-product of the aluminium industry and when you have
fluoride in your system it makes your body absorb aluminium even
faster. It helps …
(Perry: How bizarre is all
of this when you come down to the single fact that … maybe ten
years ago everyone was running around going ‘get rid of your
aluminium pots and pans …’ and yet we’re pouring it into the same
water.) Absolutely … I’ve actually gone out and bought myself
a reverse osmosis filter and we’ve converted also to rainwater –
but what about the people who can’t do that? And, in America now …
they are actually putting out health warnings for children’s
formula … not to be reconstituted with fluoridated water, for
children under the age not to use fluoridated toothpaste … and,
that if children swallow when they’re brushing, to seek assistance
from the Poisons Information Centre immediately. Where are our
warnings? While we’re expanding our fluoride in the United States
their fluoridation is shrinking because they’re actually using a
real democratic process … of referendum for areas that don’t want
it … if the referendum says ‘no’ the people don’t get fluoridated.
But we’re expanding ours and we’re still not putting out the
health warnings that they’re doing in America. This government
cannot proclaim any longer, plausible deniability of the problems
that go along with fluoridation because I did a two-hour speech in
parliament last week to put this research on the record in
Hansard, and if there is one politician who comes to me and says
that was a load of crap, I want to know how qualified they are to
discredit peer reviews published medical journals.
(Perry: When are we going
to get to a stage where parliament itself is actually going to
become a proper serious thing where we actually look after
Australia … … you were saying before that it’s more than likely a
commercial agreement with overseas countries. We seem to be
completely and utterly destroying our own selves and our own
country for the sake of globalisation.) Absolutely.
I’ll tell you when we’ll get a functional parliament - … when we
have – and I’m not talking about just me - … more true
Independents in there … and when governments stop running states
and countries like corporations instead of running them like
governments should – providing leadership, dealing with the basic
needs of their constituents and making sure that we are doing our
very best for socioeconomically deprived people and for people
with disabilities … people injured at work and pulling these sorts
of programs like fluoridation out because it’s making people sick.
(Perry: And we’re paying
for it) … you’re paying to be poisoned. At the meeting last
night in Mount Gambier it was unanimous that people are going to
not pay their water bills and the slogan is ‘If I can’t drink it
I’m not paying for it’. And there were also people down there
saying that they aren’t going to pay their rates bill because
their council did not stand up for them in the decision-making
process … they’re already doing this in Mildura where they had
forced fluoridation. They’re already polling and they’re already
setting up this public disobedience and public dissent movement
because nobody would meet with them in Warnambool or the rest of
Victoria when they were being fluoridated. No public official …
would debate with experts, medical and scientific experts. They
wouldn’t debate with them because they can’t. They cannot
medically or scientifically justify fluoridation. … you may get
some people who say ‘well I’ve been having it for 35 or 40 years
and it hasn’t done me any harm’. But if you suffer from gut
problems, cancer, bone cancer, osteoporosis, Alzheimer’s,
dementia, migraines, the list goes on … you will never know … if
the cause of that is fluoride or not, because doctors don’t know
to test for it. And in India - … the world expert on treatment of
fluorisis or fluoride toxicity, when people come into her surgery
and list anyone of those … the first thing she tests for is
fluoride. And she said in an interview that 90% of the patients
who go to her with all of these illnesses show an accumulation of
fluoride in their system. So they work to stop the intake of
fluoride in their system, and guess what? They get better.
(Perry: I … don’t
understand how we can call ourselves a democracy where if
communities don’t want something and the government is just
prepared to stomp all over everyone … we’ve got a thing where
we’ve got our ministers from the economics running around saying
‘we need to find money we’re going to lose our Triple A rating’,
well surely wouldn’t this add towards us not –if we weren’t paying
for these things? I mean we seem to be … being done over by every
country - …years ago we dropped our car tariffs. Now why as a
community we weren’t jumping up and down about that I don’t know
but it’s all a bit too late now because we’ve pretty much lost the
game in that one –and Blind Freddie could have seen that coming.)
Absolutely – Australia is being sold down the river left,
right and centre on … health policies – it’s all about corporate
greed. And when you’ve got governments functioning from corporate
greed perspectives of course the people are going to miss out and
of course the essentials in life are going to be glossed over and
ignored because you know triple A rating is far more important
than people’s health and well being. That’s upside down. It’s back
to front and it doesn’t work for government and it certainly
doesn’t work for the people.
(Perry: …it’s a very
bizarre situation … I’ve obviously been doing the right thing all
these years ... because I haven’t been drinking any water at all
while everyone else around me has been guzzling water … )
Can’t we justify our bad habits any way we want to …
(Perry: …can you please
keep me updated with how we’re all going along with these sort of
things … is there any chance of stopping it or not?) … it’s
just as easy to turn off the tap as it is to turn it on but this
isn’t just about Mount Gambier now. We’ve all been drinking
fluoridated water for 40 years. This Government has got to review
this. They’ve got to be forced – forced – to read the research and
we’ve got to start doing studies on the toxicology of fluoride in
this country. Not one study has been done in this country on the
toxic effects of fluoride. So, it should all be stopped. Let’s do
those tests, let’s do the studies, let’s do the science and you
know what – if all of these world experts, 3, 147 of them, who’ve
signed a petition to stop water fluoridation, if they’re all wrong
and our Health Minister and Dr Cunliffe are right, God forbid,
then we can turn the tap back on in maybe five years when all
these studies have been done … but until then, turn it off.
(Perry: …the one sticking
point for me is that isn’t it only supposed to help our teeth?)
… it doesn’t help our
teeth. It actually rots our teeth.
(Perry: …their argument all
along has always been that it helps our teeth … it’s not been put
forward as a miracle cure, it’s not being put forward as something
that actually stops e-coli being in the water or that sort of
thing, it’s being simply put forward as ‘If you can’t be bothered
brushing your teeth, drink this water and you’ll be ok’ … why the
big fight over it then?) … it’s money, it’s got to be money.
There’s nothing else that motivates government to do these stupid
things other than money. But I tell you, the European Court of
Justice in 2000 ruled that fluoridating water was unethical and
illegal because it was mass medication. Fluoride is not being
added to the water to improve its quality, it’s being … used to
treat a condition therefore it is a medication and they are mass
medicating and do you know a lot of anti-psychotic drugs have a
fluoride base? So, fluoride actually dulls people and I think it
was Bertrand Russell way, way back when he said there will come a
time when it will be physically, emotionally and mentally
impossible for people to rise up … so I will leave you with that.
- SA Government Media Monitoring Service -
RADIO
NEWS & TALKBACK PRECIS
v
Morning / Lunch Period
(9am–1pm)
Tuesday, 12 October, 2010
RADIO
NEWS BROADCASTS
Ann Bressington,
Independent MP
(5AA
10.35-10.44)
Water fluoridation
(Byner:
It was put to me not long ago, that the reason we even started
putting fluoride in the water didn’t have much to do with dental
caries … it was put to me … that because the aluminium and other
industries needed a place to put their waste. Now, I thought ‘that
can’t be right. Nahhh’. Well whatever their motivation was some
forty years ago, it has always been controversial and the European
court of justice has recently ruled that fluoridation in water
supplies in places that they represent is a no-no. But we in
Australia are a little different … we’re going to fluoridate the
desalinated water. Right? Now remember that we let water go out to
sea that gets salt in it, spend a lot of money to take the salt
out and then we add fluoride to it … there is debate going on now
that the state … it’s been discussed at a federal level as to
whether or not you should have fluoride in the bottled water that
you drink. Now as I said, my position is that if you want to seek
to drink this water … fine. But if you’re one of those people that
says ‘nup I think there is evidence’, and there are lots of
peer-reviewed websites and information in many medical journals
that fluoridating the water with sodium fluoride is not the way to
go. Now there’s going to be a public meeting in Mount Gambier but
this is not just a Mount Gambier issue … yes, the Blue Lakes … the
State Government want to fluoridate the water supply, they think
they know better but they haven’t got the guts to debate it have
they Ann Bressington?) No Leon … and the minister and the
Health Department put a letter in Mount Gambier’s junk mail
distribution on the very day of the public meeting stating that
fluoridation will go ahead this Thursday without keeping their
promise to have a public meeting. And he said a stock-standard
letter which regurgitates all of the … [unclear] on his behalf.
(Byner: So what did you
do?) Well I didn’t get
it – he sent it to the newspapers before he actually sent it to
me. But I would not have read it out anyway – it would have been
an insult … given that these people will not debate publicly under
any circumstances. (Byner:
Why? ) Because they can’t win … there’s a You Tube clip also
from the public health officials in Victoria where they said they
just won’t go to public debates because people get rowdy and it
makes it very difficult for them – the public health officials –
to make their point.
(Byner: But, the important point is the evidence. Now … give me a
couple of places people can go to get just the science?) Leon
I’ve got a multitude of information up on my website.
Bressington.net – that links people into all of the websites that
are available … I also have a DVD that I’ve been given permission
to copy and distribute. I have a hundred of them if people want to
contact my office - …
(Byner: Now, if you want to get the DVD … ) My phone number is
… 8237 95 96 (Byner: You
know you’re going to get inundated dontcha? [laughs]) Well
that’s fine; I want people to be educated. … I was just looking in
the dictionary about the word ‘consult’ … it says ‘to seek
permission or approval from a person for a proposed action and to
take into account and consider dealings and interests.
(Byner: Well governments
don’t do that. Not this one.) And they should not say they do.
(Byner: … do they allege
that they’ve actually had a consultation about this?) Yes
(Byner: When was it and
where …?) [unclear] over many years.
(Byner: Where was it?
Where? Where was it, where, who, who, when, when, how?) Well
we don’t know. In their dreams perhaps. … the people of Mount
Gambier have been trying to get the Minister and Doctor Cunliffe
down there for ten years.
(Byner: But … they are fluoridating, we found out – we got a
confirmation last week that the desalinated water will be
fluoridated … and I know there is discussion going on at a federal
level about putting fluoride in bottled water.) Well Leon if
this goes ahead at a federal level I can tell you the backlash for
any party … to support that –
(Byner: It’ll be done in
relative secret. There will be no consultation because after all,
the state knows better than you and me Ann. They are the purveyor
of all knowledge and science remember?)
Well sadly. But I can tell
you that … from around this country I’ve been contacted, there are
people from northern New South Wales right along the northern
coast, Queensland who are now refusing to pay their water bill or
requesting that the Government provide them with reverse osmosis
equipment to remove the fluoride from the water.
(Byner: They’re not going
to do that.) Well you know there’s such a thing as contract
law and if people - … everybody needs to do is to write a letter
withdrawing their consent from fluoride. If they don’t want
fluoride they must notify SA Health and SA Water … to consume
fluoride. That’s one step - … in a step of money.
(Byner: You know what the
problem there legally is? That you cannot withdraw what wasn’t
given in the first place. Consent wasn’t given years ago to do
it.) Well I’ve had legal advice on this and the first step is,
a letter of non-consent …
(Byner: Is that right. … ) … now that we know the science. And
I tell you, in Ballamant [phonetic], in New South Wales, there is
a class action going ahead up there against the water provider for
fluoridating people against their will.
(Byner: You know if that
gets up, a precedent of that is going to be enormous) … it’s
already stalled about a half a dozen fluoride plants from being
finished. … they aren’t that confident. This is what they’ve said
in America and the EU for Australia: it has got to end up in the
courts. Because public consultation, public non-consent isn’t
working so it will eventually have to end up in court. And I’ll
tell you, the professionals from overseas that have been
successful in having fluoride rejected and banned in other
countries are more than willing at their own expense to come over
here and present the evidence in court.
(Byner: Goodness … your
website address … again?) ….
www.bressington.net … 8237 95 96.
(Byner: Keep us in the loop … I just believe, this is about
informed choice and if you don’t want to drink fluoride then you
need to be able to adopt means within your abilities to not do
that. You don’t want the state telling you ‘we will do this for
your own good’. There’s too much of this. Far too much of it.)
- SA Government Media Monitoring Service -
RADIO NEWS & TALKBACK PRECIS
v
Morning / Lunch Period
(9am–1pm)
Wednesday, 13 October 2010
RADIO NEWS BROADCASTS
Tony Kerin, Lawyer
(5AA
11.36-11.49)
Fluoridating Mt Gambier’s water supply
(Byner:
… SA Health are about to fluoridate Mt Gambier’s Blue Lake
water supply … half the community has signed a petition and said
don’t do it. SA Health think they know better and
they’ve sent out a release … ‘Data routinely collected by
our school dental service for over 30 years shows that children in
Mt Gambier have much more decay than children from Adelaide which
has had a fluoridated water supply since 1971 … the overwhelmingly
scientific consensus is that water fluoridation as a safe and
effective public health measure. Many health organisations
including the World Health Organisation and Australia’s National
Health and Medical Research Council endorse water fluoridation for
protecting teeth against decay’. Now, I have to tell you that is a
misleading and deceptive statement because if you go to a whole
heap of websites, and I’ve got an arm length of them, peer
reviewed by medical journals and so, there’s a lot of information
to suggest that there is a problem with fluoride in the water …
it’s not just how many parts per million they put in because the
more you drink the
more parts per million you get. There’s a residual compounding
amount … over time plus anything else you get indirectly. Now,
they’re going to do it anyway … what’s people’s consumer right on
this?) Well it’s not an easy one because obviously the
provider of water in Mt Gambier is one agency. However, if there’s
as many people up in arms about it as is being reported … and
assuming there is controversial data about the safety of it … it’s
very appropriate that these concerns be echoed with Government.
The one thing that will happen is that when someone gets sick out
of this and that there’s proof or evidence that it’s linked to the
fluoride then certainly the Government opens itself up for a range
of claims. (Byner:
… if you don’t want fluoride in your water and SA Water are
putting it in can you do anything about it?) … I’d have to
have a look at the Water Act but assuming there’s nothing in there
particular to this issue you’ve got a right to deal with the
contractor as you see fit. It’s a matter of bargaining. If you
don’t want the fluoride, arguably you should approach the person
providing the product and say you don’t want it… you’re going to
need lots of voices, you’re going to need lots of advocates,
probably members of parliament involved to affect any change here.
This is a bureaucratic department which is dealing with it as it’s
dealt with for years. As you said, it’s been the case in Adelaide
for 40 years. (Byner:
… I do not wish people to do one thing or the other; all I’m
saying is there is now credible evidence out there beyond any
doubt. Doug Everingham who was a Minister for Gough Whitlam is on
YouTube … he’s doing an interview with somebody about why he’s
changed his mind on fluoride. He wrote to the Health Department,
clearly they took no notice of what he had to say, but … he’s not
the only one, there’s a whole lot of people quite eminent that
have come out about this. My interest is tell the public the
information, tell them where they can get it, they then have an
informed ability to make a choice …
you can’t filter fluoride out of the water unless you have
reverse osmosis … so that’s going to cost you $700 plus … what is
our contract with SA Water, because I’ve never signed one? … )
… under the Act it’s an authority and they have the monopoly on …
the provision of water. That doesn’t mean that you can’t negotiate
with them … it’s no different than getting extra time to pay on a
debt, in terms of principle it’s the same sort of thing.
- SA Government Media Monitoring Service -
RADIO
NEWS & TALKBACK PRECIS
v
Morning / Lunch Period
(9am–1pm)
Wednesday, 14 October 2010
RADIO NEWS BROADCASTS
Dr Martin Doolan,
Director, SA Dental Service
(891ABC 9.09-9.37)
Water fluoridation
(Bevan:
…today’s a big day for Mount Gambier … according to a media
release … earlier in the week, the Mount Gambier fluoride plant
will become operational today … Ann Bressington … got some
questions about fluoride, she’s not 100% sure that this is the way
to go.) (Abraham: …
matter of fact, her parliamentary website runs quite a lot of
information, effectively campaigning against fluoride … she’s had
a good look at what she says is the alternative arguments and
fluoride … the impending fluoridisation of Mount Gambier’s water
has become … almost revisiting the issue of whether we should have
this in our water at all…)
(Bevan: …we’re
going to talk to Ann Bressington … we’ll also talk to Dr Martin
Doolan, he’s Director of the SA Service.) (Abraham:
… We will … but the government is watching the debate on this
and in particular the way it’s being run by our commercial
competitors … 5AA … who have done quite a lot … and Today Tonight
on fluoridated water and a lot of it’s been done by Leon Byner,
again our … counterpart or whatever you’d call it, broadcaster on
5AA … it’s been brought to our attention – and these are the
government transcripts here of things
that have been said here but just a sample of it that hand
in glove I suppose with stories about the dangers of fluoride as
Leon Byner … has seen it after interviewing people reads, as they
call them, for a company that sells reverse osmosis systems …claim
to take fluoride out of the water … for example … this is from a
government transcript of 5AA ‘One of the hot topics we’ve been
discussing lately is fluoride levels in drinking water. The public
reaction to this has, as you have seen, been extraordinary.’ It
then names the company, we won’t, is a water purification company
that’s been installing water purifiers that not only meet world
standards, they set the standards. If you’re concerned about the
fluoridisation of our water supply, speak to this company about a
four stage reverse osmosis system … it’s a specialised system …
normally $905 installed but they are offering it at a special
price, $735.’) (Bevan:
And then he says ‘Act now.’) (Abraham:
… Gives the phone number… and then he says ‘When medical and
scientific journals are describing the fluoride we receive, sodium
fluoride, as toxic, it’s important that you question what you’re
drinking. For fluoride-free drinking water call…’ again he gives
the name of the company and he gives out the number, twice …
there’s a couple of examples of this over the transcripts. He says
‘look, we’ve looked at this, my clear centre position is informed
choice. If you want to put something in someone’s food or water,
then tell them. Number one, and tell the truth and give them a
choice.’ I thought it was fairly well known that fluoride was in
Adelaide’s water and it’s been fairly well known that it’s going
to be in Mount Gambier’s water. I didn’t really know but maybe
there’s another argument … we’ll put that to Ann Bressington in a
moment … but Dr Martin Doolan … is there anything to fear from the
other views and including those that are up on Ann Bressington’s
website about putting fluoride in a metropolitan water supply or
any water supply?)
The fluoridation of water
supplies is a long term public health measure and the claims that
are being made in the last weeks are nothing new, they should get
the prize for recycling. In fact in the last 20 years as a result
of claims like this the National Health and Medical Research
Council of Australia’s undertaken three separate reviews of the
safety and effectiveness of the measure and each time reaffirmed
its safety and effectiveness … so the US Centre for Disease
Control actually listed fluoridation of water supplies as one of
the ten public health achievements of the last century.
(Bevan:
…there’s nothing, absolutely nothing, potentially wrong with
this product?) All the general health claims made for
fluoridating water supply have been shown to be unsupported. When
you choose the level of fluoride to put in the water, which is
currently in Adelaide 0.9 parts per million, that level is chosen
because it achieves nearly the maximum effects in terms of
preventing decay and when you go above that level you start to get
flecking of the teeth and so there’s a balance between the two.
(Bevan:
What’s flecking of the teeth, what does that mean?)
It’s called fluorosis. What happens is when the tooth is laid
down, when it’s got enough fluoride in the material that’s laying
the tooth down, you get the strongest teeth, the best formed
teeth, well coloured teeth. When you get slightly above that level
you start to get little flecks. You can’t see them to the naked
eye, you need to dry the tooth off and look really closely and as
the level gets higher and higher it starts to have white spots.
(Bevan:
…that’s why you don’t more than 0.9 parts pm) That’s
correct. It depends on the climate. In Darwin, it’s about 0.6.
(Bevan:
…OK … is there evidence that in Adelaide’s water
supply, since it was introduced … 30, 40 years ago, that it’s ever
been above 0.9 parts pm?) No, the SA Water and its precursors
monitor the levels of fluoride within tight margins and they
publish those results and they’re tightly controlled.
(Bevan:
Yeah, yeah, yeah but has it ever been above 0.9 parts pm, has
somebody ever thrown in a bucket of fluoride more than they should
have ?) No, that’s what I said. They monitor it and they
report it - (Bevan:
And it’s never gone above that?) The way they measure it –
I believe the last time I checked – it’s 0.9parts pm plus or minus
0.1. I believe Melbourne fluoridate at 0.1 part pm, Darwin 0.6.
(Bevan:
OK, but you’re not aware of it ever being more than
that?) No. (Bevan:
OK.) (Abraham:
…And doctor, is it possible, though, to have too much fluoride at
those levels in your water just by drinking water?) I suppose
it’s theoretically possible but the first signs of having too much
are when you get that fluorosis of the teeth and I actually did
the research in South Australia in the 80s and 90s to measure the
levels of fluorosis in the children’s teeth and it is common in
both fluoridated and non fluoridated areas at very, very low
levels, just slightly higher in fluoridated areas but not at a
level that’s [unclear] (Abraham:
…Ann Bressington … on her parliamentary website … says ‘Have
you been led to believe that fluoride is added to our drinking
water to improve dental health? Are you aware that’s there’s
extensive research linking the intake of fluoride to numerous
health conditions including osteoporosis, bone cancer in young
boys, hormone disruption and it’s been confirmed as a neurotoxin –
are you aware that the fluoride added to South Australia’s
drinking water by SA Health is fluorocillic acid which is a toxic
waste product of the superphosphate, fertiliser and aluminium
industries’ and she has more information about what you haven’t
been told.) (Bevan:
Do you believe any of that is correct?) Those
claims, those statements, those shotgun approaches, listing all
the things that someone has said are caused by fluoride … have
been analysed and three times by the National Health and Medical
Research Council and they are not correct.
(Bevan:
So there’s no link to bone cancer.) No.
(Bevan:
No link to osteoporosis.) No.
(Bevan:
And you say no link to any neurotoxins.) Exactly right.
(Bevan:
OK) (Abraham: …Ann
Bressington MLC has a very different view as you would have
heard…)
Ann
Bressington, Independent MLC
(891ABC 9.17-9.34)
Water fluoridation
(Abraham:
…Why are you concerned … and where does … what rings the alarm
bells for you?)
Well what rings the alarm
bells is number 1, that there are 23 published papers, peer
reviewed … on the health effects that I’ve mentioned on my website
… there are hundreds of papers that have been written on this. The
NHMRC review that Dr Doolan refers to has not included all of the
latest research or in fact most of the latest research, it’s a
compilation of papers that have been written that are pro
fluoride. Dr Doolan says that the levels of fluoride … to his
knowledge haven’t risen past 0.9 parts pm … in Millicent
[phonetic] I think it was last year the levels of fluoride rose to
1.9parts pm and that’s on a government document … also, the
minimising .. of dental fluorosis and the occurrence of fluorosis,
I have 21 dental professionals who have come to me about this
issue in South Australia who are claiming that dental fluorosis is
on the rise … not just mottling of the teeth, that they get these
things called fluoride bombs in the tooth … the tooth can look
quite healthy on the outside … they take an xray and they see this
huge big black mass in the tooth. If they drill that, if they need
to repair a tooth and the child has these fluoride bombs, the
tooth just crumbles and it needs to be pulled out.
(Abraham:
…though in terms of public health … my generation and I’m sure
yours, we grew up with just a constant decay and no matter what
you did, no matter how much you brushed, it didn’t seem to matter
much and yet our children, since the fluoridisation of Adelaide’s
water supply, dental cavities are effectively non existent.)
That’s just not true .. we’ve got graphs that will be going up on
my website that show the decline in dental decay in … countries
that are fluoridated and countries that are not. In fact the
countries that are not fluoridated, the decline in dental decay is
far more prevalent. (Abraham:
…let’s compare within Australia … Queensland does not have
fluoride in the water and we do, what are the comparisons there?)
I grew up in Queensland and there was no fluoride … and
everybody I know - (Abraham:
…No, no, I’m asking you about … you’re jumping between graphs
and statistics and your personal experience.) No hang on, no
I’m not, no I’m not … the same argument is used to put fluoride in
the water every time the government wants to move in and
fluoridate an area and that is that the rate of tooth decay is far
greater in areas that are non fluoridated compared to areas that
are fluoridated. That science actually doesn't hold up and I have
a doctor who would have prepared to come on your show this morning
and discuss how these stats are jiggled … to produce that outcome
so instead of just … more of this is going up on my website to
explain all of these one liners that we’re getting … we’re talking
about here the toxicity of fluoride … not just teeth … this
fluorocillic acid has been proven in scientific studies to be
toxic to the human body. Now if we’re not going to take that into
consideration and consider that everybody is just their smile,
we’re going to be into big trouble.
Back
to Dr Martin Doolan
(Abraham:
…back to Dr Martin Doolan … this issue … put aside personal
experiences, we can always tell these stories, but is there a
difference between the rate of dental cavities in South Australia
where the water in Adelaide has fluoride in it and Brisbane where
it does not. Dr Martin Doolan, what’s the science on that?)
First of all… Ann
Bressington said the fluoride levels in Millicent were too high.
Millicent is not fluoridated, the water naturally has that level
of fluoride in it, it’s not a fluoridated area, it’s naturally
fluoridated like some places are. Now yes Queensland had the
highest level of decay of Australia which is why they’ve chosen to
fluoridate their waters now … it goes even further than that.
Adelaide University’s own research centre for population oral
health has published the comparisons of fluoridation for people
who have lived in fluoridated areas all their life, people who
have lived in fluoridated areas for part of their life, people who
have drunk water other than the fluoridated water and it’s a dose
response rate. If you live in an area where water’s not
fluoridated, your caries rates are higher. If you lived there part
of your life, your caries rates are a bit higher. If you don’t
drink the reticulated, fluoridated water, your caries rates are
higher again. All in the published literature, peer reviewed, the
type of things that health authorities around the world look at
and say ‘On balance, this measure really works.’
(Bevan:
Do you accept Ann Bressington’s point, that the National
Research Council, which you say has three times over the last 20
years, endorsed fluoridation, only looked at the pro fluoride
papers?) I’m not here to defend the National Health and
Medical Research Council -
(Bevan:
Dr Doolan, you’re using the council so it’s a pretty
important question.) I am, I’m using their authority as an
organisation. If you look at the large number of references in
their reports, they clearly looked at the balance of the
literature, not just the [unclear]. What on earth motivation would
the National Health and Research Council have for putting out a
biased response in this area?
Back
to Ann Bressington
(Bevan:
Ann Bressington, do you accept that the example of
Millicent isn’t relevant because Dr Doolan says that water is
naturally fluoridated, it’s not because the government’s put this
stuff in the water. Do you accept that .. Millicent isn’t part of
the equation?)
I accept that Millicent
was on the report … fluoridation and the levels, it didn’t have on
that report whether Millicent was artificially fluoridated or not
so he may be right on that.
(Bevan:
Yeah, so that’s not an example of the government
putting too much of the stuff in the water.) No.
(Bevan:
No, OK.) Well, maybe not.
(Bevan:
Well he says it’s not, he says they haven’t put anything - )
–well, we’ll check that out … he refers to the NHMRC … the
research. In 1991, on Page 142 of the NHMRC report they said ‘It
is desirable to explore in a rigorous fashion whether the vague
consolations of symptoms, which are claimed to result from
ingestion of fluoridated water, can be shown to be reproducedly
developed in these susceptible individuals. These claims are being
made with sufficient frequency to justify well designed studies
which can properly control for subject and observer [unclear].’
That recommendation was never, ever carried through.
(Abraham:
…And when was that from?) In 1991, so it’s NHMRC.
Dr
John Reed, dentist
(891ABC 9.25-9.27)
Water fluoridation
(Bevan:
... we are discussing fluoride in your water.
Dr John Reed has called 891 Mornings ... you’ve worked in
areas that both have fluoride and those that don’t have it ...
what’s your experience as a dentist?)
... I’ve been a dentist for 34 years ... my first two years after
graduating I worked in central Victoria where there was no
fluoridation. The
last 12 years I worked between Adelaide and Geelong, which also
had no fluoridated water supply ... basically the difference is
like working in a Third World country.
The level of dental health in Geelong is just appalling ...
little children having multiple extractions; teenagers regularly
needing multiple extractions and dentures and the rate of full
clearances of extracting all teeth for adults is absolutely
horrendous ... you come back to South Australia and regularly
you’ll see ... teenagers and 20 year olds that need no treatment
whatsoever because ... purely the effect of fluoridated water
supply ... in Geelong I was able to tell where somebody had lived,
been born and raised – if they lived in Melbourne they had no
fillings in Melbourne, if they lived in Geelong they had appalling
teeth ... that’s a difference of 80km away
(Abraham:
Dr John Reed, thank you).
Back
to Dr Martin Doolan
(Caller
Frieda:… so many people drink bottled water, whether the so
called spring water that is in the bottles has been tested for
fluoride and how much natural fluoride is in the bottled water.)
...they are
tested, they’re not allowed to be sold unless they’re tested and
there are varying levels of fluoride in bottled water, mostly very
low and there are upper limits. The upper limit’s not in my head
at the moment but they are monitored carefully. Just recently
there’s been moves to allow the manufacturers to add fluoride to
the bottled water if they want to to provide people choice … and
that … because one of the effects of people drinking more and more
bottled water with low fluoride levels … the research shows that
people that do that actually get more decay because they’re not
getting the protection of the reticulated water.
(Bevan:
…question from listener via the SMSes “Doesn't fluoride
in toothpaste do enough?”) The fluoride in toothpaste works,
it does prevent caries but it doesn't prevent caries as
effectively as water fluoridation. It has a secondary effect too.
It works best in people who clean their teeth well, surprisingly,
and that means people from socially deprived backgrounds who
aren’t as thorough with their personal oral hygiene don’t get the
benefit. Water fluoridation on the other hand actually has its
biggest effect in people who are from disadvantaged backgrounds.
(Caller Alex:
…recently
read a book … published six years ago by an investigative
journalist in America … Christopher Bryson … The Fluoride
Deception … it would appear that this whole issue has been driven
by powerful industries, they’ve got a massive amount of this
poison they’ve got to get rid of and the interesting thing is - )
(Abraham: …I wouldn't
have thought there’d be much money in fluoride, maybe I’m wrong,
because there’s also a big industry, Alex, obviously, in taking …
water filters … there’s a lot of money to be made in that so there
may be interest in a bit of a fear campaign that way, I don't
know…) Well this book is 360 pages of research … amazing read
… thing is, that nobody’s talking about the fact that diet and
lack of brushing teeth is probably more of a problem with dental
caries … know a young lad who in his rebelliousness stopped
brushing his teeth when he was 16 and he drank fluoridated water
for six years and he still had all his teeth taken out.
(Abraham:
…Well if he wasn’t brushing his teeth … he didn’t have many
girlfriends either…) (Caller
Dagma: …I have two boys … late 20s … only had tank water … no
fluoride … even now as adults … one still on the farm … the other
one drinks nothing but rain water …) (Abraham:
…but they brush their teeth?) (Caller
Dagma: …yes, let me finish. Both boys have never had to have
any dental work … let me finish, my daughter in law who has always
had fluoridated water … formative years in the city, has nothing
but caries and has been going to the dentist all the time.)
Back
to Ann Bressington
(Abraham:
...
we’re just going to wrap
this up now and give both Ann Bressington and Dr Martin Doolan a
chance to have just a summary quickly ... we’ll put this debate on
the web because I think it’s been I hope a balanced view.
Ann Bressington ... just give you a chance to wrap up Ann)
Okay two points.
Number one, the toxicity of fluoride on the rest of the human body
– there are numerous studies showing that there is great cause for
concern. Number
two, choice - do we or do we not have the choice or should we or
should we not have the choice whether we drink or ingest a
substance that is deemed by the European court of justice to be
mass medication? It’s
not enhancing water quality, it is being used to treat a
condition, therefore it is being used as a medicine ... only 5% of
the world’s population are still fluoridating, other countries
have banned this all around the world
(Abraham:
... Ann Bressington, we do thank you.)
Back
to Dr Martin Doolan
(Abraham:
... finally also to Dr Martin Doolan ... if you just want to
wrap up as well briefly)
Sure. The claims that
were being given again are recycled claims that have been examined
time and again. The
200 million people in the world who drink fluoridated water
benefit significantly by about 40% less decay.
It’s a public health measure that was really worth the
effort and frees up resources for other useful activities of
government and increases the health and wellbeing of our
communities significantly (Abraham:
Well thank you as well Dr Martin Doolan ... and water fluoride
begins in Mt Gambier today. It is introduced to the water after it
is taken from the Blue Lake).
|